Akalın, A., Yıldırım, K., Wilson, C. & Kilicoglu, O. 2009. Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house facades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 124-132. Akalın, A., Yıldırım, K., Wilson, C. & Saylan, A. 2010. Users’ evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness. Open House International, 35(1), 57-65. Akalın-Başkaya, A., & Yıldırım, K. 2007. Design of circulation axes in densely-used polyclinic waiting halls. Building and Environment, 42, 1743–1751. Arslan H.D., Ceylan M., 2012. “Judging Primary School Classroom Spaces Via ANN Model” Gazi University Journal of Science, 25, 1. Aydıntan, E. 2001. Yüzey Kaplama Malzemelerinin İç Mekân Algısına Anlamsal Boyutta Etkisi Üzerine Deneysel Bir Çalışma, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trabzon. Başkaya, A., Dinç, P., Aybar, U., Karakaşlı, M. 2003. Mekansal İmaj Üzerine Bir Deneme: Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Eğitim Bloğu Giriş Holü, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt. 18, No. 2, s. 79-94. Başkaya, A., Yıldırım, K., Muslu, M. S. 2005. Poliklinik Bekleme Alanlarında Fonksiyonel ve Algı-Davranışsal Kalite: Ankara, İbni Sina Hastanesi Polikliniği, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt. 20, No. 1, s. 53-68. Berlyne, D. E. 1974. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Wiley. Biaggio, M. K. & Supplee, K. A. 1983. Dimensions of aesthetic perception. Journal of Psychology, 114, 29-35. Daroff, K., & Rappoport, J. E. 1992. Elements of a typical office facility. In J. E. Rappoport, R. F. Cushman, & K. Daroff (Eds.), Office planning and design desk reference. Wiley Inter-Science. David C., Catherine, Geary/M. 2001. DeSoto Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities Among Adults from the United States and China Evolution and Cognition, 172, 7, 2. Dunn, J. V., Hayes, M. V. 2000. Social Inequality, Population Health, and Housing: A Study of two Vancouver Neighborhoods”, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 563-587. Coluccia, E., Louse, G., 2004. Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review - Journal of environmental psychology. Erdoğan E., Akalın A., Yıldırım K., Erdoğan A., 2010a. Aesthetic Differences between Freshmen and Pre-architects, Gazi University Journal of Science, 23(4):501-509. Erdoğan E., Akalın A., Yıldırım K., Erdoğan A., 2010b. Students’ evaluations of different architectural styles Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 875–881 Evans, G. W. 2003. The Built Environment and Mental Health, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy Medicine, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 536-555. Gifford, R. 1980. Judgements of the built environment as a function of individual differences and context. Journal of Man-Environment Relations, 1, 22-31. Gifford, R., Hine D. W., Müler-Clemm, W., Reynolds,nD. J. and Shaw, K. T. 2000. Decoding Modern Architecture: A Lens Model Approach for Understanding the Aesthetic Differences of Architects and Laypersons, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 32, pp. 168-187. Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Clemm, W. M., Shaw, K. T. 2002. Why Architects and Laypersons Judge Buildings Differently: Cognitive Properties and Physical Bases, Journal of Architectureal and Planning Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 131-148. Halpern DF., 2013. Sex differences in cognitive abilities, - books.google.com Herzog, T. R., & Gale, T. A. 1996. Preference for urban buildings as a function of age and nature context. Environment and Behavior, 28, 44-72. Holbrook, M., Schindler, R., 1994. “Age, Sex, and Attitude toward the Past as Predictors of Consumers’ Aesthetic Tastes for Cultural Products”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, 412-22. İmamoğlu, C 2000. Complexity, preference and familiarity: architecture and nonarchitecture Turkish students’ assessments of traditional and modern house facades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 5–16. Jones, Catherine M.; Braithwaite, Victoria A.; Healy, Susan D., 2003. The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol 117(3), 403-411. Joyce, M. L., Lambert, D. R., 1996. “Memories of the Way Stores Were and Retail Store Image”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 24, 24-33. Kim J., Dear R., Candido C. Ve Zhang H., Arens E., 2013. Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality, Building and Environment, 70, 245-256. Kobayash, K., Sato, M. 1992. Type Ia Supernova Progenitors, Environmental Effects and Cosmic Supernova Effects, Type Ia Supernova: Theory & Cosmology, pp. 63-89. Küller, R. 2002. The Influence of Light on Circarhythms in Humans, Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, Vol. 21, pp. 87–91. Küller, R., Ballal, S., Laike, T., Mikellides, M., Tonello, G. 2006. The İmpact of Light and Colour on Psychological Mood: A Cross-Cultural Study of İndoor Work Environments, Ergonomics, Vol. 49, No. 14, pp. 1496- 1507. Michelson, W. 1976. Man and his urban environment. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Nasar, J. L. 1989. Symbolic meaning of house styles. Environment and Behavior, 21, 235-257. Noguchi, H., Sakaguchi, T. 1999. Effect of Illuminance and Color Temperature on Lowering of Physiological Activity, Applied Human Science Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 117-123. Royse, D.C. 1969. Social inferences via environmental cues. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Şenyiğit Ö., 2010. Biçimsel ve anlamsal ifade aracı olan cephelerin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir yaklaşım; İstanbul’da Meşrutiyet ve Halaskargazi Caddeleri’ndeki Cephelerin İncelenmesi, Doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Stamps, A. E. 2003. Advances in visual diversity and entropy. Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 30, 449–463. Stamps, A. E. III, Nasar, J. L., 1997. Design review and public preferences: Effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0036 Tsunetsugu, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Sato, H. 2005. Visual Effects of İnterior Design in Actual-Size Living Rooms on Physiological Reponses, Building and Environment, Vol. 40, pp. 1341-1346. Wethman, C. 1968. The social meaning of the physical environment. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Yamaner, F. 2001. Farklı Fonksiyonlarda Renk Kullanımına İlişkin Yaklaşımların Değerlendirilmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya. Yıldırım K., Cağatay K., Hidayetoğlu LM., 2015. “The effect of age, gender and education level on customer evaluations of retail furniture store atmospheric attributes” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43,8,712-726. Yıldırım, K. 2005. Bir Ticari Mekân İmajının Müşteri Karakteristiklerine Bağlı Olarak Farklı Yorumlanması, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt. 20, No. 4, s. 473-481. Yıldırım, K., Cağatay, K. and Hidayetoğlu, M.L., 2015. "The effect of age, gender and education level on customer evaluations of retail furniture store atmospheric attributes", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 43 Iss: 8. Yıldırım, K., Hidayetoğlu, M. L., Şen, A. 2007. Farklı Mimari Biçimlerdeki Kafe/Pastane Mekanlarının Kullanıcıların Algı-Davranışsal Performansı Üzerine Etkisi, Gazi Üniersitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt. 10, No. 3, s. 295-301. Zülkadiroğlu D., 2013-., Mimari Cephe Temsillerinin Kullanıcı Algısına Etkisinin İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul.